Answer:
The correct answer is negotiation.
Explanation:
A definition of negotiation that appears on the internet expresses, which is the communication process that aims to influence the behavior of others and where both parties reach a WIN-WIN agreement. The reason why at the end of a negotiation both parties can believe that they have won is that neither the interests nor the values have to be opposed, and it is the responsibility of the negotiators to discover the complementary points to develop a negotiation with the win-win scheme.
On the other hand, negotiation techniques are defined as the mechanisms and models of behavior that the parties use to influence the other and achieve a satisfactory solution to a conflictive encounter. These actions are based on the potential power of the parties involved in the negotiation.
Answer:
Overhead= $3,212
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sigma Corporation applies overhead costs to jobs based on direct labor cost.
Job W, which is still in process at year-end, shows charges of $2,700 for direct materials and $4,400 for direct labor.
Job V:
$6,300 for direct materials.
$8,500 for direct labor.
$6,205 for overhead on its job cost sheet.
First, we need to calculate the overhead rate.
Overhead rate= 6205/8500= $0.73 per direct labor dollar
Job W:
Direct labor= 4,400
Overhead= 4,400*0.73= $3,212
Answer: Federal aid
Explanation:
Federal aid helps students with the cost of tuition for everyone. It allows for students to keep out of major debt.
Answer:
$208
Explanation:
Using the FIFO Inventory method, inventory items are assumed to be sold in the order in which they were purchased from the earliest to the latest.
The order of purchase of the inventory items are.
Jun. 1, DVD Player 1012, $113
Nov. 1, DVD Player 1045, $95
Nov. 31, DVD Player 1056, $88
Therefore, if two of the three items are sold, the cost of goods sold is the cost of the first two items purchased
= 113 + 95 = $208.
Answer: (E) none of the other choices
Explanation:
None of the options are correct in the above question.
The USA extends Most Favoured Nation Status to most countries in the world including Germany so that would not be a reason for the car's not to pass through customs.
The cars could indeed be a threat to national security. Just because they come from a safe country does not mean that they were not tampered with. They need to be properly inspected.
They are indeed a source of competition for US automakers but that would be no reason to stop them. Perhaps tariffs could be applied on them but they will not be stopped.
There is no provision in US Customs practices that prohibits the importation of used cars solely because they are used cars therefore it will not be a reason to halt the car's going through customs.
None of the options are therefore correct.
