1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ELEN [110]
3 years ago
12

On January 18, Karen received her credit card statement specifying that the due date to pay the bill is January 30. Which Act wa

s violated in this scenario?
Social Studies
1 answer:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
8 0
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the act which was violated in this scenario when Karen received her credit card statement specifying that the due date to pay the bill is January 30, is the consumer act. 
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
You might be interested in
PLS PLS PLS HELP!!!!!!
Anni [7]

Answer:

Answer is A Trust me I was a tryhard in middle school

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A provision in a residential lease stating that the landlord cutting off heat or water will not constitute an eviction is:
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

D). Unconscionable

Explanation:

Unconscionable is a precept in contract law which depicts the extremely immoral, oppressive, or unjust laws as obstructive to good conscience. These laws overwhelmingly favor one party of the contract due to its superiority in bargaining abilities.

As per the question, the provision of 'landlord's authority to cut off heat or water' in a residential lease exemplifies such immoral or outrageous laws that can outrage the sensibility or conscience of the courts and courts have the complete authority to refuse the enforcement of such unjust laws. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.

4 0
3 years ago
Children born between the Europeans and the local women were called
Goryan [66]
Yurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
6 0
2 years ago
Question 3 (2 points)
Novay_Z [31]
The answer is emotional
3 0
3 years ago
10. In a psychology class debate on the trait perspective on personality, you need to take the opposing view and rebut its posit
ELEN [110]

Answer:

People do not act or behave with predictable consistency

Explanation:

One of the general criticisms of the trait perspective is that people do not act or behave with predictable consistency. This is based on the idea that a person might act differently as predicted or expected of them given the circumstances, their personal experiences, their mental and cognitive state at that point and other such factors. Hence, the trait perspective might not be able to provide an accurate description based on habitual patterns of behavior or action or thoughts.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP MEEE!!
    13·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the regional cultures and economies of the English, French, and Spanish areas of control in the Americas. H
    9·1 answer
  • What general principle was established with the Plessy v. Ferguson Surpreme Court decision?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe the events of the passover. What did people have to do for god to see that people had chosen him as god. CHRISTIAN STUD
    5·1 answer
  • What does the U.S. capitol raid reveal about the American Dream? <br> 40 points
    14·1 answer
  • In your own words tell me what this picture is saying.
    12·1 answer
  • Which nation started colonies in the Americas first
    14·2 answers
  • The citizens were taxed by the
    5·1 answer
  • The creation of trade routes led to which development Mesopotamia
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the role of explorers in founding European colonies. Focus on one explorer or one colony
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!