Answer:
B
Explanation:
He was largely responsible for moving the civil rights forward in Oklahoma. He destroyed the need for segregated bathrooms and complied with laws that stated that education could not be segregated in Oklahoma. (The case cited was Brown v Board of Education).
Answer:
The results showed that historians had ranked Franklin D. Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama as the best since that year.
But Abraham Lincoln is often considered the greatest president for his leadership during the American Civil War.
Explanation:
His eloquence in speeches such as the Gettysburg Address. James Buchanan is often considered the worst president for his inept leadership during the years leading up to the Civil War.
The 6th is 'thou shalt not kill" the 9th is "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor"
There will be no solution because parallel lines never intersect. If there is no intersection between lines, there is no solution.
Hope this helped! Please mark as brainliest if it's correct
Answer:
look below since I think the answer gives limited amounts of characters
Explanation:
If I was in Truman's shoes and I lost the ships from Pearl Harbor I would definately fight back, there is no way I'm going to stay quiet from someone hurting my country and costs lives and lots of money. The options were Raid Japan, Invade Japan, bomb in an inhabitant area or a populated area.
<em>Pros and cons of</em><em> raiding Japan</em><em> </em>
<em>pros- Japan will see us as a threat and no longer want to mess with the US </em>
<em>CONS-More lives will be lost and will lose a future ally. </em>
<em />
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>invading Japan</em>
<em>pros- Japan will be ours and they will have to surrender </em>
<em>CONS- could cost more lives lost than needed. </em>
<em />
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing inhabited area</em>
<em>pros- </em><em>No one gets hurt and less lives will be lost </em>
<em>cons- Japan might cause another bombing </em>
<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing populated area</em>
<em>pros- Japan will fear us and must surrender </em>
<em>cons- many lives will be lost .</em>
<em />
I believe Truman was better off dropping the bomb to prove to other countries to never mess with the USA again and if he didn't Japan might cause another bombing.
