All categories

3 years ago

________ is the term used to describe what happens when a project's scope increases after it has started.

1 answer:

3 0

Answer: <u>Scope Creep</u> is the term used to describe what happens when a project's scope increases after it has started.

Explanation: Scope Creep refers to unscheduled changes and are the main reason for failures in a project, whether due to uncontrolled growth or some deviation in planning. This happens when the scope is not documented in the correct way. The more aware you are of the deviations that the project may have, the better the final result will be.

You might be interested in

What is the best thing to do to keep myself occupied?

katrin [286]

Answer

learn a new language or just do something you rarely do

Explanation:

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Leslie is purchasing a car whose MSRP is $25,750. She has asked for an

CaHeK987 [17]

I think the answer is D because I took math all my school years and I’m smart.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose the Baldwin company shifts focus to only competing in the Thrift and Nano segments, while competing on price by reducing

Volgvan

What.
Maybe niche cost leader

4 0

3 years ago

Simon Company's year-end balance sheets follow. Current Yr 1 Yr Ago 2 Yrs Ago At December 31 Assets Cash Accounts receivable, ne

weqwewe [10]

Answer:

1a. Current ratio = Current assets / Current Liabilities

Current year = $224,517 / $120168 = 1.88 : 1

1 years ago = $175,652 / $70,310 = 2.50 : 1

2 years ago =$134,088 / $44,840 = 2.99 : 1

1b. The Current ratio worse over three years period

2a. Acid test ratio = (Cash + Investment + Account Receivables) / Current liabilities

Current year = ($29,328 + $0 + $83,351) / $120,168 = 0.94 : 1

1 year ago = ($32,285 + $0 + $57,663) / $70,310 = 1.28 : 1

2 year ago = ($34,323 + $0 + $45,764) / $44,840 = 1.79 : 1

2b. The Acid test ratio are worse over three years period

8 0

3 years ago

Respond to the following short answer prompt: Imagine you are a lead social science researcher and are responsible for approving

GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

Answer is given in the explanation

Explanation:

1. Racial predisposition; this research violates very basic ethical code of racial discrimination. There is no way that a researcher can be allowed to target a specific group of people based on their biological race. This type of discrimination hinders the authenticity of research and have far reaching repercussions for the target group as well as the whole society.

2. Electroshock therapy; this research’s target population is preteens and adolescents, experimenting such an extreme punishment on them has no justification. This causes direct harm to the children. Besides the electroshock are used on chronic psychic patients not on general public not even adults let alone the preteens.

3. Health Problems, Diet, and Socioeconomic Status; this research proposal is better than the previous two proposals but it has some ethical regarding the consequences of the publicly published findings. Rather it would be more effective to keep these findings to the policy makers and work for the betterment of the lower status peoples so that they can also eat healthy diet.

6 0

4 years ago