Answer:
(29,800)
Explanation:
The computation of the financial advantage or disadvantage is shown below:
As we know that
Financial disadvantage = Cost of making - Cost of buying
where,
Cost of making is
= [(Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit) × units produced] + additional segment margin
= [($4.7 + $9.30 + $9.80 + $5.20) × 22,000 units] + $34,000
= ($29 × 22,000 units ) + $34,000
= $672,000
And, the Cost of buying is
= Units produced × offered price
= 22,000 units × $31.90
= $701,800
So,
Financial disadvantage is
= Cost of making - Cost of buying
= $672,000 - $701,800
= (29,800)
While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.
Explanation:
- Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.
- Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
- Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.
Answer:
Allocated administrative cost for mixing is $81000
And allocated administrative cost for for bottling is $81000
Explanation:
We have given total number of employs for mixing = 350
And total number of employs for bottling = 350
Administrative cost = $162000
So total number of employs = 350+350 = 700
So allocation base for mixing 
So allocated amount for mixing = 0.5×$162000 = $81000
Allocation base for bottling =
So allocated amount for bottling = 0.5×$162000 = $81000
1) Know the complaint. Ask what they think is the best solution to resolve the problem. Weigh the pros and cons of their suggestions. If more pros than cons, implement their suggestions. If more cons than pros, ask them to suggest other ways of solving their complaints.
2) Narrow down the choices. Give them shorter time to think and hold them to their decision.
3) Let them share their expertise with others.
4) Let them share their ideas more. Let them be more involve in team activities so that they will feel that they belong.
5) Give them projects that they can kickstart. That way they will have a way to channel their aggressiveness. Let them be part of team building activities to help them adjust with other people's personalities.
Adverse selection describes situations when high-risk persons are more likely to receive insurance or when one bargaining side has important knowledge that the other does not. Our goal is to influence decision-makers, both inside and outside of government, to consider the future and adopt long-term plans.
When vendors and/or purchasers have different knowledge about a certain component of a product's quality, this is referred to as adverse selection. Thus, those who work in hazardous environments or lead high-risk lives are more likely to buy life or disability insurance, knowing that they will likely be able to use it.
To learn more on world bank
brainly.com/question/3520105
#SPJ4
