An effect of internal migration on the economy of the American West during the late 19th century was it helped western businesses address labor shortages. Thus the correct answer is B.
<h3>What is migration?</h3>
Migration is referred to as the movement of people from one place to another to look for better opportunities and facilities for a living to help to achieve the goals of their life.
The effect of migration is result in innovation, as people from different background moves to foreign countries and brings skills and talents along with them which will lead to innovation.
This will helps western businesses to address the problem of labor shortages as most people will look for employment to survive. Organizations can hire them in their business units to fulfill their shortage of manpower.
Therefore option B it helped businesses to address the shortage of labor in western countries will be appropriate.
Learn more about migration, here:
brainly.com/question/17991559
#SPJ1
The best explanation for the resurgence of conservatism in the 1980s is President Reagan's success in reviving the American economy.
<h3>Why did conservatism rise again in the 1980s?</h3>
A lot of Americans were alarmed by what they saw as moral decay in society and so they voted for Reagan who was a conservative.
Reagan's economic policies led to a revival in the U.S. economy which then led to more people supporting him and becoming conservative.
Find out more on Ronald Reagan at
#SPJ1
Lin Zexu, leading Chinese scholar and official of the Qing (Manchu) dynasty, ... up to the first Opium War (1839–42) between Britain and China. ... he had no idea that his success in stopping the opium trade would only open ... was granted any rights in China that might be granted to other foreign countries).
pls thank me and mark me as brinliest
Answer:
I guess this is Just my opinionated answer but its all I could think of- the reason that the question is controversial is all of the subjects within the question are still to this day considered below the average white man. and each and every one of those subjects have fought to get to the amount of power they have today almost equally, and 10x harder than the average white man. ill explain:
Explanation:
women: woman got the right to vote in 1920- this is the 19th amendment to the U.S constitution- it took 19 amendments for a woman in this country to have a voice. before that- woman could barely breathe in public without being burned at the stake (AHEM: salem witch trials) and women still to this day arent taken seriously- we just got our 1st female vice president Kamala Harris- and the bitter (primarily white men) make it a point to say that women should not be in a position of power- and if they are THEY DEFINITELY SLEPT WITH THEIR BOSS. but let a woman attack a mans ego and he dams all women
Natives: well lets just start with the fact that THE COLONIZERS stole the land that was originally owned by natives- they were kinda there first . and then the FACT that the British turned around and KILLED every native they came in contact with. and then the natives had to deal with IMPERIALISM which was basically forcing the white mans ways on any other race, culture, religeon, or ethnicity- because the white man concidered it uncivilized to be different.
chicanos: mexican american war: mexico used to own California, new Mexico, arizona, and texas but one of the previous presidents sold them to the US to avoid a boarder war. - well guess what that didnt stop very much. because yes 1,000s of immigrants are legally (and illegally) crossing the boarder into a new life- but racism is everywhere and latin American people were even forced to pick grapes at 1 point.
african American: SLAVERY, the civil rights movement, police brutality, these are just some of the things they had to face- and still have to today. and they continue to fight for the rights that others are just born with.
so the progress, the success- in general- id say is about the same- speaking about how hard the history (and present day) was and is for all of these subjects. that in its self is how i believe that the question is controversial
(excuse the long explanation)
.............The answer is B
