Explanation:
<em>Tom Robinson is accused of harming and r*ping a young white woman named Mayella Ewell. Atticus Finsh, a laywer, is appointed Tom's case. This part of the trial is told and watched through Scout Finch who is Atticus's daughter. Scout enters the coutroom and sees Sheriff Tate on the stand, repeating the events of the alleged crime and what he would be charged with. With this, Tate says that Mayella was hit on the right side of her face. Atticus then asks Ewell to write his name on a piece of paper, which we come to find that Ewell is left-handed thus making him a suspect. </em>
<em>Then, Mayella takes the stand and immediately she begins to weep, scared of what Atticus will do to break her. Onxe she is calm, she tells her side of the story. Mayella explains that she asked Tom to bust up a chiffarobe. When Mayella went inside to pay Tom, Tom had followed her into the house and beat and r**ed her.</em>
<em>Everyone agrees that Mayella was hit on the right side of her face, so everyone believes that the suspenct was left-handed. In this moment, Atticus asks Tom to stand up, which then shows the court, Tom's left arm which is deformed. </em>
<em>Soon, Atticus calls his only witness he needs.. Tom Robinson. Tom tells the true story. He was invited into the Ewell house to fix a loose door, but then he was attacked inside by Mayella. Mayella kissed and hugged Tom. She had never kissed any man so she though she might as well kiss a n****r Tom admits to beating up a chiffarobe, but not during this time. He also admits to running away when Bob Ewell showed up, but he didn't harm Mayella in any way. All he heard was Bob threatening Mayella. </em>
<u><em>Hope this helps!</em></u>
<u><em>Please mark brainliest! ^^</em></u>
Answer:
D. People can still walk up the stairs to one of the bell towers and take in an amazing view of the city.
Explanation:
This is actually very easy, check it out: Answers B and C have citations included at the end of the material ("Patel 65"), meaning that those sentences have properly displayed a source for the content they incorporate. So, they are not plagiarized. And answer A is a completely unique sentence that takes no words from the exemplified text. Answer D however, takes text directly from the example almost word-for-word without a source citation. Though the author attempted to switch out the word "astonishing" for "amazing," that is one difference of three minimum to avoid plagiarism. So, it has been plagiarized.
Answer:
para 1- to promise se uninterrupted continuation
para 2- to remind all Americans for peace and liberty
para 3- to clarify that an end as the para begins with 'no misunderstanding'
para 4- to warn that only victor's can carry out justice.
hope this helps!