Constitutional monarchy, system of government in which a monarch (see monarchy) shares power with a constitutionally organized government. The monarch may be the de facto head of state or a purely ceremonial leader. The constitution allocates the rest of the government's power to the legislature and judiciary.
I believe the answer is: <span>attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
It most commonly known as ADHD. This disorders make the victims unable to focus on a single task due to strong impulses to constantly moved and do many different thigs at once. ADHD could be easily managed by consuming drugs such as Adderall and ritalin</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
