I think either excited or confused. Since the first sentence is well, with an exclamation point, I guess I would lean towards excited. It would help to know more of the story.
Answer:
Sigo aqui a pesar
Explanation:
Sigo aqui a pesar de lo malo
De ese oscuro pasado
Siempre estoy junto a ti
Sigo aqui abrazado a lo nuestro
A este amor tan inmenso
Que no sabe morir
He llorado tanto mas
Que el cielo
Lagrimas de dolor
He tocado fondo tantas veces
luchando por tu amor
Soy incondicional
Un amor tan real que
No juzga que suena
Que sufre y perdona
Un amor de verdad
Soy Incondicional
Un amor tan real
Que no espera
Algo a cambio
Que no tiene horario
Un amor de verdad
NNNnno no no
Descubri
Que un amor verdadero
Se entrega por completo
Y eso hice por ti..
He llorado tanto mas
Que el cielo
Lagrimas de dolor
He tocado fondo tantas veces
luchando por tu amor
(coro)
Soy incondicional
Un amor tan real que
No…
Answer:
To give you actual facts about topics. Fiction isn't always accurate when it comes to subjects.
Explanation:
Romanticism is a method used to reveal the beauty or truth existing in the mankind using words and characters, so your answer would be D. :)
Answer:
E). During the period immediately before the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater struck, most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the region of the asteroid’s impending impact.
Explanation:
As per the question, option E displays the statement that would most likely weaken the argument, if true as it functions to deny the author's claim that 'when the asteroid(around six miles ago) struck the Earth, the last dinosaur species were becoming extinct' by presenting contradictory statement 'most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the region of the asteroid’s impending impact.' Thus, this statement(if true) would not only weaken the argument but also influence the author's credibility and character among the audience. Thus, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer.
