Answer:
The underlying cause of the Cold War was conflicting ideologies.
Explanation:
The underlying cause of the Cold War was conflicting ideologies.
The Cold War refers to a period after World War II up until the early 1990's in which the United States and Soviet Union were in constant conflict. It is referred to as a "cold" war because there was no physical fighting directly between the US and Soviet Union. One of the biggest causes of the Cold War was conflicting ideologies.
Land served as a u.s senator and as general for the union
Weakness of the bell ring bell is not a big issue for you guys but I have no problem at all I can make sure you get it in my order or do you need anything else I will send it back to me
I don’t know what you mean but hopefully this might help:)
In 43 AD the Roman conquest of Britain began; the Romans maintained control of their province of Britannia until the early 5th century. The end of Roman rule in Britain facilitated the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, which historians often regard as the origin of England and of the English people
The ideology of Nazism is socialism, often known as nationalist socialism (NA-ZI). Recognize that Hitler was but one socialist party or fraction competing to rule Germany. Hitler required a competitive advantage. He struck an agreement with businesspeople. Despite their dislike, he was well-liked. He may have been viewed as a moron who would ruin himself. It didn't take place. Conservatives or capitalists had rightful interests. They desired to safeguard their money. They didn't want to give up their title to the land. Hitler had to make sure that these businessmen didn't feel cut off from their factories. So, he got what he wanted while also giving them what they wanted. After the conflict, they kept their capital. Specifically, real estate (if not destroyed). Business has conflicting motivations for Hitler to succeed. They would have undoubtedly wished for the conflict to end quickly. Hitler therefore rejected capitalism and its property rights as a socialist, but at the last minute he conceded title 'practically,' giving him an advantage over his unworkable socialist faction warriors who would only ruin industry. Therefore, he is not a capitalist. He rejected the voluntarism and property rights that are the cornerstones of markets.
