1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin2010 [14]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following describes the Iron Curtain? the border between North and South Vietnam the border between the United Stat

es and Mexico the line dividing democratic and communist countries in Europe the wall dividing East and West Berlin
History
1 answer:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Answer: the line dividing democratic and communist countries in Europe. The term was used to name the ideological, political and sometimes physical borders between Western (Democratic) nations in Europe and Eastern (communist) nations in Europe, after the II World War. </span>
You might be interested in
What is the difference between the cause and effect of an event in history
Mashutka [201]
Well the cause of a certain event in history will mean something happens.
The effect is the result of the event happening

For example. With 9/11 the cause was the twin towers collapsing. The effect would have been thousands of people dying as the result of the planes being highjacked
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In poetry meter is the pattern of ​
AfilCa [17]

Basic rhythmic structure of a verse or lines in verse.

6 1
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Of these three men, which one was vocally in favor of slavery?
ludmilkaskok [199]
C and false is correct answer
4 0
3 years ago
What was the American system
Alex777 [14]
Was a three-pronged plan aimed at: Improving the economy of the United States. Introducing a protective Tariff to enable the nation to raise money from these taxes and at the same time protect the nation's goods from cheaper priced foreign items.

Textbook answer (I’m doing that rn)
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Jacksonian democrats consider the political deal between Adams and Clay "corrupt"?
Wittaler [7]

The 1824 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION marked the final collapse of the Republican-Federalist political framework. For the first time no candidate ran as a Federalist, while five significant candidates competed as Democratic-Republicans. Clearly, no party system functioned in 1824. The official candidate of the Democratic-Republicans to replace Monroe was WILLIAM H. CRAWFORD, the secretary of the treasury. A caucus of Republicans in Congress had selected him, but this backing by party insiders turned out to be a liability as other candidates called for a more open process for selecting candidates.

The outcome of the very close election surprised political leaders. The winner in the all-important Electoral College was Andrew Jackson, the hero of the War of 1812, with ninety-nine votes. He was followed by JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, the son of the second president and Monroe' secretary of state, who secured eighty-four votes. Meanwhile Crawford trailed well behind with just forty-one votes. Although Jackson seemed to have won a narrow victory, receiving 43 percent of the popular vote versus just 30 percent for Adams, he would not be seated as the country's sixth president. Because nobody had received a majority of votes in the electoral college, the House of Representatives had to choose between the top two candidates.


After losing the Presidency to Andrew Jackson in 1828, John Quincy Adams was elected to the House of Representatives where he served until his death in 1848.

Henry Clay, the speaker of the House of Representatives, now held a decisive position. As a presidential candidate himself in 1824 (he finished fourth in the electoral college), Clay had led some of the strongest attacks against Jackson. Rather than see the nation's top office go to a man he detested, the Kentuckian Clay forged an Ohio Valley-New England coalition that secured the White House for John Quincy Adams. In return Adams named Clay as his secretary of state, a position that had been the stepping-stone to the presidency for the previous four executives.

This arrangement, however, hardly proved beneficial for either Adams or Clay. Denounced immediately as a "CORRUPT BARGAIN" by supporters of Jackson, the antagonistic presidential race of 1828 began practically before Adams even took office. To Jacksonians the ADAMS-CLAY ALLIANCE symbolized a corrupt system where elite insiders pursued their own interests without heeding the will of the people.

The JACKSONIANS, of course, overstated their case; after all, Jackson fell far short of a majority in the general vote in 1824. Nevertheless, when the Adams administration continued to favor a strong federal role in economic development, Jacksonians denounced their political enemies as using government favors to reward their friends and economic elites. By contrast, Jackson presented himself as a champion of the common man and by doing so furthered the democratization of American politics.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What which precedent was established as a result of the John Peter Zenger case in 1735
    7·1 answer
  • What was Sarah Vaughan most famous for?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the small physiographic region in Georgia which is largest
    5·1 answer
  • The genocide in the Ottoman Empire and Cambodia could both be described as
    6·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP I WILL UPVOTE The Neutrality Acts (1936-1939) held that the United States
    12·2 answers
  • Which is more important freedom or security(safety) and why?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the interactions among muslim, Christian, and Jewish peoples under ottoman rule
    13·1 answer
  • Describe how Cooking is used to be done in the past and present?<br>Now:<br>In the past:​
    7·1 answer
  • ░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░
    5·2 answers
  • What is the reason <br> Daoists argue against<br> Confucianism.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!