A.
Societies are built upon the idea and the foundation of ordering communities. It only makes sense that this order is there to protect the well-being of it's members.
I'd argue that the best of societies are those that promote spirituality, which is an aspect to wellness and well-being. Answer A definitely includes this, whereas answer C specifies and focuses on only this aspect.
Considering the scenario described above, at the store, I am an employee. This is because I'm hired full-time.
Also, because an office manager is supervising me, that shows I am an employee.
Also, given that I work within normal business hours at the store, that is a characteristic of an employee. Again, payment of wages is associated with employee relations.
On the other hand, I work as an independent contractor at the pub because I decide the music to play and get paid per gig.
Also, given that I don't work at normal hours and get paid at a lump sum, this is an independent contractor working feature.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that I worked as an independent contractor at the pub and an employee at the store.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20834227
Answer:
the best way to compare the output in quantities over a period of times will be (D) real GDP.
this is becasue real GDP is calculated by adjusting for the changes in prices, therefore it does not contain any changes in the prices and only reflects the increase or decrease of the output quantities.
Explanation:
I inferred you are to the 2017 TEDx talk "Short-termism is killing us: it's time for Long path" by Ari Wallach.
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to Wallach, he refers to short-termism as focusing on short-term results at the expense of long-term interests.
In his words, short-termism is a problem because;
- "it prevents the CEO from buying really expensive safety equipment"
- "prevents teachers from spending quality one-on-one time with their students".
So in summary what Wallach is saying is that short-termism prevents futuristic thinking.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Negative Indirect.
This is due to the indirect affect of tax on the purchase of new vehicle because a new tax on gasoline reduces the consumers incentive to the buy the new vehicles. Therefore, it is a negative indirect incentive.
Also, there is a fall in the number of cars or vehicles purchased because of the tax imposed on the gasoline.
