The evidence Levitt and Dubner present in response to the counterclaim is that 7-7 wresters' results drop (first option).
<h3>What is a counterclaim?</h3>
This is a statement that disproves the main claim or thesis. Moreover, this can be answered by providing evidence that disproves the counterclaim.
<h3>What evidence do Levitt and Dubner present?</h3>
The counterclaim is that a 7-7 is more likely to win, this can be disproved through the detail that these wrestlers' results drop because this shows they are not more likely to win than others.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here are the options:
In the next match, 7-7 wrestlers' results drop below their predicted percentage.
The 7-7 wrestlers do well against both 8-6 and 9-5 opponents.
Wrestling matches only last a few seconds and are won by a quick exertion of force.
Wrestlers from the same stable do not oppose one another.
Learn more about counterclaim in: brainly.com/question/1757292
#SPJ1
i’m pretty sure the answer is C
Answer:
Two against arguments about the claim that Americans do not need to learn a second language is that the world will not be limited to publishing information only in English, and that American professionals who speak more than one language have better opportunities.
Explanation:
The article "Why Learn Another Language?" shows how the United States should encourage its citizens to learn another language, even if the whole world is learning English. The text shows that by learning a second language, Americans will have more opportunities, both in the professional area and in capturing new information that can be transmitted in several languages. In a nutshell, the text shows that learning another language only brings benefits to people's lives.
Can you post a picture of the question?
