1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
3 years ago
14

Brainliest to first answer!!

Law
2 answers:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Hey

Explanation:

Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

...................that would help.............................

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A bank lends money to a family so that it can buy a new house. This lets the family pay for the house over time instead of havin
inysia [295]

Answer:

standard deferred payment

Explanation:

just got it right on quiz

6 0
3 years ago
Is it illegal for a 24 year old to date a 39 year old?
Mademuasel [1]

Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.

Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.

7 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the chicken cross the road?? ;)
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

to get to the other side!!!

4 0
3 years ago
2. If rules are universal, or if rules are not universal - does that make you feel more secure in making a decision?
crimeas [40]

Answer:

According to me...I won't feel confident when making that decision because that decision will be based on the rules that I must follow and I also believe that when I'm taking a decision is going to be based on what situation you are in.

So decisions are not suppose to be based on rules because everyone have a right to take or make a decision that is suitable for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The __________ has held that obscenity should be determined by applying contemporary community standards rather than national st
    8·1 answer
  • There are several steps to opening a savings account. Select all of these steps.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following developments during the 1780s produced the STRONGEST calls for a new national constitution and government
    5·1 answer
  • During the 1950s, psychology and social psychological research played key roles in the new focus on prisoner's health and well-b
    8·1 answer
  • Note that common activities are listed toward the top, and less common activities are listed toward the bottom. According to O*N
    7·2 answers
  • Hopw does one become a justice on the supreme court
    13·1 answer
  • The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution tells the purpose of the government. Which words or phrases in the Preamble do you believe
    10·2 answers
  • The State of California has decided to improve traffic safety. To do so, law makers look at a variety of options. These options
    7·1 answer
  • Jamie Lee and Ross are now having the attorney draw up a will for each of them. What is the purpose of having a will
    13·1 answer
  • What was Preston Tucker's dream?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!