1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
3 years ago
10

A major cause of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was the Question 21 options: A. defeat of Germany in the Russian campaign

History
2 answers:
storchak [24]3 years ago
6 0
A major cause of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was the C. existence of sharp economic differences between social classes.
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is C
You might be interested in
Check
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

Decline in trade - shift to a rural society

Explanation:

The fall of the Roman Empire brought significant changes in the mode of rule and governance. After the fall, the empire was governed by the warrior kings. The traditional and community guidelines were given priority than the written laws. There was a drastic change in the economic stability of the empire as well. The economy inclined towards the agricultural sector as the result of the collapse of the trade. It was because of the decline in the trade that shifted the empire towards the rural society.

4 0
3 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Which constitutional power was most directly
Alina [70]
Assuming that this is referring to the same letter that was posted before with this question, the response is "(3) power of impeachment by the House of
<span>Representatives"</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How many Civil War battles did the Union side win?
Tasya [4]
One. The Battle of Antietam.

The reason I say one is because the Confederacy has better War Generals, they had a more experienced militia. That’s why they were undefeated for so long. But The battle of Antietam of 1862 was the battle the Union, the North, celebrated because of their first victory against the Confederacy, the South.
8 0
3 years ago
Why is the holocaust event very important to talk about today ?
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

For us to know to not repeat it. because people blindly follow political leaders   and that is how the Nazis took power.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What important Anti-Federalist idea is expressed in this excerpt from the Anti-Federalist Papers?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true of North Carolina during World War II?
    13·1 answer
  • What was one of the most important effects of world war2 on the Texas economy
    15·1 answer
  • This image shows "Big Three" leaders meeting at Yalta in February 1945, where they continued making plans that would eventually
    5·2 answers
  • The Southern colonies supported plantation economics. This meant they had large farms and grew crops, which they exported.
    11·2 answers
  • What was the goal of reconstruction during the civil war?
    5·1 answer
  • In what time period did Japan experience an industrial revolution? A. first half of the 18th century B. second half of the 19th
    5·2 answers
  • How did literature, art, and music reflect cultural attitudes during the 1920s? Check all that apply
    11·2 answers
  • Just like the federal (national) government, the state government is set up with a three-branch system that includes a legislati
    10·1 answer
  • Who founded the town that became known as Centralia?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!