Nazi Germany was chaotic. Wide spread racism was apparent in the air towards Jews, Gypsies, Bisexuals, and many more minorities. Hitler brainwashed all his followers into believing in an autocratic government which ensured it's followers in permanent prosperous in the near future. Nazi Germany was well known around the world, making it have many enemies (and some allies) at that time. Nazi Germany will be forever known. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
C. farmer
Explanation:
back in the days slave people are farmers
Answer:
Anti-libertairan, Anti-socialism, Exclusion of certian groups, Nationalism.
Explanation:
anti-liberalism, rejecting individual rights, civil liberties, free enterprise and democracy.
anti-socialism, rejecting economic principles based on socialist frameworks.
exclusion of certain groups, often through violence.
nationalism that seeks to expand the nation's influence and power.
Answer:
<u>The Gold Rush had an effect on California's landscape.</u>
Explanation:
<em><u>Rivers were dammed or became clogged with sediment, forests were logged to provide needed timber, and the land was torn up all in pursuit of gold.</u></em>
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
