Answer: $60238
Explanation:
First and foremost, we need to calculate the over applied overhead which will be the difference between the actual overhead and the applied overhead. This will be:
= $78600 - $75000
= $3600
Then, the portion allocated to the cost of goods sold will be:
= $3600 × $57600 /($57600 + $21000)
= $3600 × $57600/$78600
= $3600 × 0.7328
= $2638
Therefore, the cost of Goods Sold after the proration will be:
= $57600 + $2638
= $60238
Answer:
$517.50
Explanation:
we have to use the future value formula:
future value = present value x (1 + interest rate)ⁿ
- present value = $450
- interest rate = 15%
- n = 1 year
future value = $450 x (1 + 15%) = $450 x 1.15 = $517.50
The basic premise of finances is that the value of money changes over time, i.e. one dollar today is worth more than one dollar tomorrow. That is because the money yo have today can be invested and it can interest, therefore, it will be worth more in the future.
This is ab example of a price floor. It is price that set by the government as a minimum price that would be imposed on a product. This value should be higher than that of the equilibrium price to be effective. It is used in order to prevent the prices to be too low.
Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
Uber's Organizational Culture during former CEO Kalanick's tenure:
A. observable artifacts
Explanation:
Observable artifacts are the visible cultural manifestations prevalent in an organization, through which the organization's culture is expressed in tangible terms. A culture of casualness will become visible in the dress code and how people address one another by first names or surnames. Even the way products are displayed and offices are furnished reflect observable artifacts of an organization's deeper culture of acceptance and openness.
