Answer: A, B, and C
Explanation:
All of the above can happen while the bill is in committee.
GATHERS INFORMATION THROUGH HEARING
A committee would need to evaluate the merits and demerits of a particular bill before they can propose it. They do this through hearings usually to a subcommittee, which will then present it's findings to the whole committee.
DECISION TO SEND TO FLOOR
After a bill has been evaluated, the committee has the discretion to send the bill to the floor of the House to continue along the legislative process. The Speaker of the house may set time limits on the committee and failure to work on a bill is equivalent to killing it.
CHANGES LANGUAGE OF BILL
The Committee will hold a 'mark-up' session where the bill may be revised and additions made. If the additions are substantial, the bill can reintroduced as a 'clean-bill' which will have a new number as well as the proposed changes.
Troponin binds to Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. The propagation of an action potential along a skeletal muscle fiber causes the release of Ca2+.
What is a cross-bridge cycle?
As seen by the cross-bridge cycling, the action of the contractile proteins shortens muscles. The cross-bridge muscular contraction cycle can be seen in many types of muscles, including cardiac, smooth, and skeletal muscles. Therefore, when riding across bridges, all muscle groups contract.
What transpires in skeletal muscle during a cross bridge cycle?
The Pi dissociates after the myosin creates a cross-bridge with actin, causing the myosin to proceed through the power stroke and shorten the sarcomere, which lowers its energy state. In order to dismantle the cross-bridge
To know more about cross bridge cycle visit:
brainly.com/question/7031861
#SPJ4
Answer:
The fallacy found in the argument is:
e. slippery slope.
Explanation:
A fallacy is a flawed way of reasoning that ends up invalidating an argument. In the paragraph we are analyzing here, the type of fallacy used is called slippery slope.
Slippery slope is a reasoning that, from little evidence, develops a whole sequence of events that get more and more serious. It often ends with a catastrophic consequence. In this case, the speaker goes from a child wanting a slingshot to that child, in the future, owning several different types of heavy weapons.
