We frequently incorporate knowledge into schemas, which are systems of knowing that impact how we see our social environment.
<h3>What exactly does the term "schema" mean?</h3>
Schema is a general name for the mental structures that aid in the organization and processing of the information we encounter through the use of mental models, such as those based on our experiences, culture, age, and gender.
<h3>Why are schemas valuable, and for what purposes?</h3>
Organizing and interpreting information is facilitated by cognitive frameworks or concepts called schemas. Schemas can be helpful because they let us use quick cuts to interpret the large amount of information that is readily available in our surroundings.
Learn more about schema: brainly.com/question/27965727
#SPJ4
Human ecology is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary study of the relationship between humans and their natural, social, and built environments.
Human Ecology One end of a continuum is occupied by environmental determinism, and the other by cultural determinism; both contend that the human state is solely a product of either nature or culture. Between these two extremes, there is a broad spectrum of views referred to as either "environmental probablism" or "environmental possibilism." Cultural ecology is the study of how human beings and their traditions and beliefs assist individuals in engaging with their environment's constraints. Ecology is the science of how living things interact with their environments.
Learn more about Human Ecology here:
brainly.com/question/17265606
#SPJ9
I believe the answer is: <span>Garland is in a minimally conscious state.
In a minimally conscious state, a patient posses a partial awareness on the things that happened within his/her environment.
But that patient do not possess the ability to make a complex action like talking or walking.</span>
Answer:
(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.
(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).
(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.
