1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
3 years ago
10

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 unit

s of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:
Available Methods to Reduce Pollution
1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation.
2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits.

Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive.


Firm X 80 130 210
Firm Y 75 90 130
Firm Z 550 700 1,075

Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units.

Method 1: Regulation
The first government employee suggests to limit pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to reduce its pollution by 2 units.

Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units.

Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution (Dollars)
Firm X
Firm Y
Firm Z

Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 12 units to 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, it can emit 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on a price. For example, if firm X agrees to sell a permit to firm Y at an agreed-upon price, then firm Y would end up with three permits and would need to reduce its pollution by only 1 unit while firm X would end up with only one permit and would have to reduce its pollution by 3 units. Assume the negotiation and exchange of permits are costless. Because firm Y has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm Z and a permit from firm X so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. What prices is firm Z willing to sell one of its permits to firm Y, but firm X is not?
Business
1 answer:
murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

yep

Explanation:

Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:

Available Methods to Reduce Pollution

1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation.

2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits.

Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive.

Firm X 80 130 210

Firm Y 75 90 130

Firm Z 550 700 1,075

Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units.

Method 1: Regulation

The first government employee suggests to limit pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to reduce its pollution by 2 units.

Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units.

Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution (Dollars)

Firm X

Firm Y

Firm Z

Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 12 units to 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, it can emit 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on a price. For example, if firm X agrees to sell a permit to firm Y at an agreed-upon price, then firm Y would end up with three permits and would need to reduce its pollution by only 1 unit while firm X would end up with only one permit and would have to reduce its pollution by 3 units. Assume the negotiation and exchange of permits are costless. Because firm Y has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm Z and a permit from firm X so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. What prices is firm Z willing to sell one of its permits to firm Y, but firm X is not?

You might be interested in
Worker A is more effective than Worker B. Both workers become less effective as their workloads increase. Both workers are paid
sineoko [7]

Answer: False

Explanation:

Question mentions that even though Worker A and Worker B are both paid the same salary and become less effective as their workload increase, Worker A is still more effective than Worker B.

The optimal allocation therefore would be one where Worker A get more of the 200 units of production than Worker B because they would be able to produce more as they are more effective.

8 0
3 years ago
Eduardo’s new company wanted to be transparent about all their products, so he chose to market his cleaners as 30 percent toxic
givi [52]

Answer:

The correct option is false.

Explanation:

Knowing the past inclination is said to exist when an individual overestimates his/her capacity of foreseeing the results of any occasion which are by difficult to be anticipated.  

For instance, an individual X anticipating the triumph of Indian group as the consequence of India-Australia cricket coordinate. In spite of the fact that the Indian group may dominate the game, yet that was not a result of the expectation of individual X's forecast.  

Here, Eduardo isn't anticipating any results, however is adhering to being honest and straightforward to his clients. Henceforth, knowing the past predisposition doesn't exist.

7 0
3 years ago
The stated purposed of NAFTA is to A. gain membership in the WTO. B. reduce the outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries. C. pha
jekas [21]

Answer:

C. phase out all trade and tariff barriers among​ Canada, Mexico, and the U.S

Explanation:

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

This agreement creates a bloc of trade for the region, Canada, Mexico and the US.

As state on "C" It result in the elimination or reduction of barriers to trade and investment between the countries.

It will be replaced in the following year by the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA)

But NAFTA will keep working until this new agreement is finished.

4 0
3 years ago
The __________ assures the payment of otherwise non-collectable court judgments against licensees who have committed fraud, misr
Finger [1]

The SAFE act assures the payment of otherwise non-collectable court judgments against licensees who have committed fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, or conversion of trust funds in a transaction.

<h3>What is the SAFE act?</h3>

This was the act in the United States that made it mandatory for houses to be registered and licensed.

The act is based on houses that are used as residences. The full meaning of the act is the  Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act.

The main purpose of the SAFE act is to try to ensure that consumers are protected and also help in the reduction of fraud. This would be done by setting a standard for licensing and the originators of mortgage loans.

Hence the correct answer to the question is the SAFE act.

Read more on court judgement here; brainly.com/question/14077067

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Consider a firm with a daily demand of 100​ units, a production rate per day of 500​ units, a setup cost of​ $200, and an annual
podryga [215]

Answer: 980

Explanation:

The number of units of inventory that the storage area must be able to​ hold will be calculated as:

Demand = 100 × 300 = 30000

Production rate per day = 500

Setup cost = $200

Annual holding cost = $10

We then use the economic order quantity formula to solve and the answer will be gotten as 1225

The maximum inventory will now be:

= EQQ × (1-d/p)

= 1225 × (1-100/500)

= 1225 × ( 1 - 0.2)

= 1225 × 0.8

= 980

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following would cause a shift in the demand curve loading from point A to point B?
    7·1 answer
  • A yearly statement of the financial condition, progress, and expectations of an organization
    15·2 answers
  • Juanita Corporation uses a job-order costing system and applies overhead on the basis of direct labor cost. At the end of Octobe
    8·1 answer
  • Decathlon Corp., a sports shoe manufacturer, launches a new line of sports shoes. To promote the product, Decathlon Corp. invite
    14·1 answer
  • Paul Inc. forecasts a capital budget of $725,000. The CFO wants to maintain a target capital structure of 45% debt and 55% equit
    12·1 answer
  • Mortgages, loans taken to purchase a property, involve regular payments at fixed intervals and are treated as reverse annuities.
    14·1 answer
  • Classify the following topics as relating to microeconomics or microeconomics.
    13·1 answer
  • Self-management is about (1) knowing who you are and what you want to accomplish in your life, and (2) making these things happe
    13·1 answer
  • If u had a choice would you help have dying family member of be a multi-millionaire
    9·2 answers
  • Chapman Company obtains 100 percent of Abernethy Company’s stock on January 1, 2020. As of that date, Abernethy has the followin
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!