Answer:
<em>August</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>7</em><em>-</em><em>2</em><em>9</em><em>,</em><em>1</em><em>9</em><em>6</em><em>8</em>
Explanation:
at the International Amphitheatre in Chicago, Illinois, United States. As President Lyndon B. Johnson had announced he would not seek reelection, the purpose of the convention was to select a new presidential nominee for the Democratic Party.
I believe it was Spain. they were the ones who discovered a lot during that time period.
Zimmerman telegram was a turning point in many U.S. citizens' attitude about entering the war because its contains that Germany would cede United States territory to Mexico if Mexico cooperated with the German military..
<h3>What was the Zimmerman telegram?</h3>
It was an transmitted message that contains a secret diplomatic writing which was intended by Germany to form an alliance with Mexico.
Prior to the war, the U.S. States intended to fight against the Germans during the first world War and the Germans intended to form an alliance with Mexico if the US engaged against them.
Hence, because the telegram message contains an agreement made by Germany to cede US territories to Mexico if they cooperate, it became the turning point in which many U.S. citizens' attitude about entering the war began.
Read more about Zimmerman telegram
brainly.com/question/24372880
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
Answer:
Middle Atlantic
North Central
Explanation:
although the person above me had one of the answers, they didn't quite answer it right, but the answers I have put above are correct because I took the test and got those right.
hope this helped! have a good week and weekend! :D
