1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Talja [164]
3 years ago
14

3. Why was life especially difficult for the first slaves?

History
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The vast majority of labor was unpaid. The only enslaved person at Monticello who received something approximating a wage was George Granger, Sr., who was paid $65 a year (about half the wage of a white overseer) when he served as Monticello overseer.Life expectancy was short, on many plantations only 7-9 years.Industrial slaves worked twelve hours per day, six days per week. The only breaks they received were for a short lunch during the day, and Sunday or the occasional holiday during the week.Fearing that black literacy would prove a threat to the slave system -- which relied on slaves' dependence on masters -- whites in many colonies instituted laws forbidding slaves to learn to read or write and making it a crime for others to teach them.However, the health of plantation slaves was far worse than that of whites. Unsanitary conditions, inadequate nutrition and unrelenting hard labor made slaves highly susceptible to disease. Illnesses were generally not treated adequately, and slaves were often forced to work even when sick.Slaves were punished by whipping, shackling, beating, mutilation, branding, and/or imprisonment. Punishment was most often meted out in response to disobedience or perceived infractions, but masters or overseers sometimes abused slaves to assert dominance.

You might be interested in
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bogdan [553]
A. Byzantium (Constantinople)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A list titled The 10 Plagues of Egypt. God sent 10 plagues before the Egyptian pharaoh let the Israelite slaves go free. 1, Wate
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

Hello There! I picked A. Not entirely sure. EDGE 2020.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did conservatism affect the nationalist movements in Europe? It promoted the overthrow of absolute monarchies. It forced nat
Airida [17]

I believe the answer is: It delayed or extended nationalist struggles.

The nationalist struggles come after different nations started to fully embodied nationalist movement, which make them tend to incline to prove their nation's superiority over another nations. This type of thinking often lead to conflicts among these european nations.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Turning point of world war 2?
Tomtit [17]
This is a hard question that is open to discussion even among historians who specifically study World War 2 as a topic and specialize in it. 

The most frequent answers that would probably be given is: 
1. Pearl Harbor - with the attack of the Japanese on Pearl Harbor, USA was effectively dragged into the war which may have tipped the odds in favour of the Allies.
2. Stalingrad - the Soviet Union captured a huge German army in Stalingrad. The soldiers from this army were either imprisoned until the rest of the war or died due to hunger. In effect this meant that the German forces lost a whole army on the Eastern front. 
3. Normandy landings - the Normandy invasion gave the Allies a foothold on the beaches of Western Europe from where they could invade through the mainland right into Berlin by the end. 
7 0
3 years ago
What is Zinn's approach to the study of history? What does he suggest occurs when history is told as a story of human progress?
alina1380 [7]

Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.

History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pls help!!! will get brainly!!<br> What were some of the differences between Patriots and Loyalists?
    11·2 answers
  • Which fact below is not true of the mercantile theory? encouraged founding colonies made mother country self-sufficient supporte
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Africans Americans who moved to northern cities still face limitations because of their race?
    5·2 answers
  • After the war, the major difference between Woodrow Wilson and the leaders of Britain and France was:
    10·1 answer
  • How were steam-powered ships different from sail boats?
    10·1 answer
  • .The …………………. was the effective ruler of EEIC’s territories in India
    8·1 answer
  • What did the aborigines believe about the land in the past?
    6·1 answer
  • Which two elements of narrative nonfiction can you identify in this excerpt from “My Brother Paul” by Theodore Dreiser?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! WILL CHOOSE BRAINLIEST!
    14·1 answer
  • According to MLK, why was it necessary to create "tension in society"?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!