The correct answer is B.
Louisiana, also known as French Lousiana was an administrative district of the whole region controlled by France in North America, called New France. The name of the territory was decided in honour of King Louis XIV of France.
This territory was controlled by France but not really developed due to a lack of funding and human resources. After the French defeat in the Seven Years War, part of the territory of Lousiana was lost and transferred to the British winners.
<em>In fact, the names of those places abovementioned are clearly derived from the French language (for example, rouge= red in French, or the surname Delocroix which is French too). </em>
The anser is A hope this helped
Answer:
Wealth among European working classes
Explanation:
Considering that New Imperialism is characterized by the form of colonialism whereby many Europeans including the likes of the United States, Russia, and Japan controlled the resources and affairs of smaller nations or territories across the continents.
During this period, the colonial countries or masters brought their working class to the colonized territories and work there such that they earn more money and accumulate more wealth compared to the previous period.
Hence, Wealth among European working classes is what grew during the New Imperialism
Answer:
D. It created more opportunities for higher education.
Explanation:
One of the impacts of the 90 percent literacy rate in the United States in the late 1800s was that it 8t created even more opportunity for higher education.
A person is said to be literate of he can read and write.
New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
