no longer useful i believe
Answer: Gibbons v. Odgen was a Supre Court case about interstate commerce.
The case of Gibbons v. Ogden of 1824 established that the states are not allowed to interfere with the authority of Congress to regulate commerce. The states cannot. In 1819, Aaron Ogden lost a suit against Thomas Gibbons. Gibbons operated steamboats without the authorization of the Monopoly that Fulton and Livingston had with the authorization of the state of New York since 1798. Odgen did purchase the rights to operate his steamboats. So Odgen sued Gibbons and Ogden won. But Gibbons appealed and the Supreme Court favored Gibbons and the decision ended with monopolies in navigation.
Explanation: brainliest is helpful :)
I couldn't get the causes (Sorry!) but I got 4 effects
Over 51,000 people were killed or wounded
General Lee tried to resign
The battle turned the tide of the war in the Union's favor
<span>The north rejoiced, the south was devistated</span>
They were friendly and he made a trade with beads and such for some water.
D) oil business
..........................
