A change in quantity supplied is a movement along the supply curve, while a change in supply is a shift in the supply curve.
<h3>What is a supply curve?</h3>
The supply curve is a positively sloped curve that shows how quantity supplied changes with price of the good. All things being equal, the higher the price of the good, the higher the quantity supplied.
<h3>What is a change in supply and a change in quantity supplied?</h3>
A change in quantity supplied is as a result of a change in the price of the good. If price increases, quantity supplied increases and if it decreases, quantity supplied decreases.
A change in supply is caused by other factors other than price. Some of these factors include:
- A change in the number of suppliers
- The cost in the price of raw materials needed in the production of the good.
A change in supply leads to a movement outward or inward.
To learn more about supply curves, please check: brainly.com/question/26073189
Answer:
$1,241
Explanation:
For computing the net advantage to leasing first we have to determine the total cash flow from leasing and total cash flow from buying which is shown below:
For leasing:
Year Lease payment PVF at 5.8% Present value
1 $6,500 0.9452 $6,144
2 $6,500 0.8934 $5,807
3 $6,500 0.8444 $5,489
Total outflow $17,440
For buy:
Year Outflow or inflow PVF at 5.8% Present value
0 ($23,000) 1 ($23,000)
1 $1,610 0.9452 $1,522
2 $1,610 0.8934 $1,438
3 $1,610 0.8444 $1,359
Total outflow $18,681
Now the net advantage to leasing is
= Buy outflow - leasing outflow
= $18,681 - $17,440
= $1,241
We can actually deduce here that the unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics as: D. Secondary effects.
<h3>What is unintended consequence?</h3>
Unintended consequence, as seen in social sciences are known to be the result or outcome that is gotten from a purposeful action which were not seen coming.
The options that complete the question are:
a. scarcity constraints.
b. marginal effects.
c. opportunity costs.
d. secondary effects
We can actually deduce here that such unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics are known to be secondary effects.
Learn more about unintended consequence on brainly.com/question/17228614
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is A. increase tax rates and/or reduce government spending.
Explanation:
Increasing the tax burden is an easy way for the state to increase its income temporarily and subject matter, but it turns out that increasing the tax burden affects productivity and consumption, so in the end the income of the productive sector is diminished, and more taxes on a lower taxable base does not imply increasing revenues.
When a government decides to reduce public spending for a fiscal balance, it is limited to reducing the social assistance and social security, but not to reduce the bureaucratic apparatus that curiously is usually high in countries with economic crisis, and also Be a source of corruption corruption.
This shorter payback period is positive and beneficial to the consumer, as it allows for harmony with amortization expenses.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- A short payback period is beneficial because of its relationship to amortization, as long-term debt allows this amortization to take place.
- These amortization expenses allow the cost of long-term assets to be represented in the payment.
- However, when the short-term payback period allows for amortization, causing the asset's value to be reduced by the amount that will be paid by the consumer.
In this case, we can state that in cases like the one shown in the question above, the short payback period is very beneficial and interesting to the consumer, as it can promote economic benefits.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23160357?referrer=searchResults
