Answer:
A) have zero alphas
Explanation:
Stock's alpha show show much they have over or under performed in relation to similar peer stocks. But if the stocks were correctly priced, then alpha should be 0 since no variation, either positive or negative should occur. Alpha basically measures the error in the stock's valuation. It is always better to have positive alphas because if you make a mistake then hopefully is in your favor, but alphas can also be negative and that equals unexpected losses.
This is why the CAPM model only considers beta in its calculation.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
If there is an increase in the income of the consumer then as a result there is a parallel shift in the budget line. This increase in income will increase the real purchasing power of the consumers and hence, this would increase the quantity of two goods consumed in an equal proportion.
Other factors remains the same, an increase in the income level of the consumer will increase the consumption of both the goods because the prices of both the goods are constant.
Answer: Andy's demand for beer to increase
Explanation:
Andy's views beer and pizza as complement to each other. Hence when the price of pizza decreases Andy's demand for beer would increase as he would order more beer than pizza so as to complement both offers.
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
The correct answer would be, Reverse Discrimination.
Recently, businesses have experienced debate over Reverse Discrimination, the practice of discriminating against a dominant or majority group of persons.
Explanation:
When people or group of people who were discriminated against previously, are being favored, then this practice is known as the Reverse Discrimination.
For example, reverse discrimination can be caused in an organization where previously discriminated Muslims are now being preferred and hired by the company.
Similarly the same practice can be seen in the companies where females are now being hired(even though the males are more qualified for the job) who were previously discriminated against men.
Reverse Discrimination is not a fair practice, because it is still a Discrimination.
Learn more about Reverse Discrimination at:
brainly.com/question/8562925
#LearnWithBrainly
