Answer:An equity interest valued at $5,000 owned by the investigator's spouse in a company that produces products related to the investigator's institutional responsibilities.
Explanation: U.S. public health service is an organization of the United States Government, it employs about 6000 employees as public health professionals whose main aim is to promote public health,carry out activities to prevent diseases and advance public health science and Health assurance. An equity interest valued at $5,000 owned by the investigator's spouse in a company that produces products related to the investigator's institutional responsibilities would be considered as a significant Interest.
Answer:
There would be NO IMPACT
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed about, rialto company collected $5,000 on account. In this case there will be no impact of this transaction on the firm's current ratio. The collection on account can be regarded as exchange of asset transaction, any increase change in current asset account cash, then there will be decreases in Accounts Receivable , the ration of current asset to current liabilities gives the current ratio, there is no impact of transaction on the current ratio, since the transaction doesn't affect both the
current asset to current liabilities
Answer:
d. If the WACC is 9%, Project B's NPV will be higher than Project A's.
Explanation:
The internal rate of return is the return in which the NPV is zero i.e cash inflows equal to the initial investment
While the WACC refers to the cost of capital by considering the capital structure i.e cost of equity, cost of preferred stock and cost of debt by taking their weightage
Now if the WACC is 9% so project B NPV would be higher as compared to project A as we can see that project B IRR is greater than the project A IRR
Therefore option d is correct
Answer:
The responses to the given choices can be defined as follows:
Explanation:
Assume is the investment. Each original Class A investment is of the net-front unburden. The portfolio will be worth four years from now:
You will place the total of 
on class B shares, but only 
will be paid 
at a rate of 
and you'll pay a 
back-end load charge if you sell for a four-year period.
After 4 years, your portfolio worth would be:
Their portfolio worth would be: after charging the backend load fee:
When the horizon is four years, class B shares are also the best option.
Class A shares would value from a 12-year time frame:
In this case, no back-end load is required for Class B securities as the horizon is larger than 5 years.
Its value of the class B shares, therefore, is as follows:
Class B shares aren't any longer a valid option in this, prolonged duration. Its impact on class B fees of 
cumulates over a period and eventually outweighs the 
the burden of class A shareholders.
Answer: The value of this exchange is $8,816.05.
Explanation:
The problem is dealing with a simple case of arbitrage of exchange rates: Lets assume that
k = koruna
b = baht
Step 1:
Sales Revenue = k2,200,000
(To get USD amount : 
Purchase Cost = b3,200,000
(To get USD amount : 
Step 2:
Profit = Sales Revenue - Purchase cost
= $86,750.7886 - $77,934.7297
= $8,816.0589
The value of this exchange is $8,816.05.
