Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
The correct answer would be, Philosophy is a necessary discipline.
Yes philosophy is a necessary discipline even after the progress of Science and Technology.
Explanation:
When the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality and existence is being studied, especially in academic disciplines, it is called as Philosophy.
Philosophy is something which is needed to be studied for every other educational or professional discipline in order to know the real essence or the idea behind them. When we won't understand the philosophy of anything, we won't be able to understand the thing itself.
Philosophy is a necessary Discipline, whether there is a progress in Science and Technology, Philosophy will always be a necessary unavoidable discipline because it covers the most ground of any academic discipline.
Learn more about Philosophy at:
brainly.com/question/843412
#LearnWithBrainly
Social Darwinism was most likely applied to treat immigrants from different regions differently, however, Social Darwinism does not specifically relate to immigrants but also to all members of society. In the American context, the notion was implemented to popularize the notion of "survival of the fittest" or that the strongest members of a society will succeed and the political system should support this theory.
Claim of argument, perhaps!
<span />
