Answer:
Control of the Mississippi River during the American Civil War was an economic and psychological factor for both the North and the South.
There were several actions of the government around the turn of the century that social Darwinists would disapproved of, but one of the major ones was aid to the poor.
A is most likely right because a lot modern European countries get their borders from cultural and linguistic boundaries after old empires like Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Germany split up. Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Slovenia, just to name a few, were ethnic groups without countries before WW1.
B: isn't true, just look at eastern Europe in the 17th century, tons of ethnic groups living in one country. Even with more immigration to the Europe, most immigrants assimilate into European cultures.
C: Although geography can influence political borders to varying degrees, European nations don't strictly follow physical geographic features to my knowledge. There are a lot of borders based off of rivers you can see have stayed the same despite the rivers moving (Serbia and Croatia's border is a prime example)
D: I don't know what 'define' means in this context, but if it means religion and geography are the main reasons Europe get's their borders is just flat out wrong. We already talked about geography, but religion doesn't effect European borders since most European countries are christians and are secular. The only example I can think off the top of my head of religion affecting borders is in Ireland when they separated the protestant north from the rest of the island which was catholic.
Hope this helped you out :)
Conservation should be given to smaller units to protect them from competition and provide more employment opportunities. Bigger firms should not be given protection.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The conservation which is important for the economy is the conservation given to the industries and the manufacturing units which are at smaller level to give employment opportunities to the people of the economy and protect them from competition.
But the conservation and protection to bigger firms should not be given, these should be exposed to competition so that they work in more efficient way and provide more choices to the people in the market.
