How did the Patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church differ from the Pope of the Holy Roman Catholic Church?

1 answer:

3 0

Because of the Great Schism - - East-West Schism - there was a split of the Christianity into an Eastern Orthodox Catholicism and a Roman Catholicism.

This happened especially because Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as a Holy Roman Emperor, the Byzantine Empire did not like this and eventually, this led to a formal split that occurred in 1054.

Because of this split, the Roman Catholic Church that existed in the Byzantine Empire became Greek Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church was maintained.

The Eastern Orthodox Church was no central doctrinal or governance, unlike the Roman Catholic Church, that has the Catholic pope. The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople is considered as a primus inter pares of the bishops that run each church.

You might be interested in

Under a system of common law, which elements are used as the basis of a legal decision? check all that apply. a judge's feelings

eimsori [14]

<span>the results of other trials for the same crime
</span>
<span>the treatment of similar crimes in the past

Common laws evolve over time and are evident today in the form of judicial precedents whereby the decision of a high national court is legally binding on other lower courts.
</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me!! i really need it

nataly862011 [7]

Answer:

Sorry Its cannot seen clearly.

7 0

3 years ago

What is the paradox as related to slavery in the United States?

EastWind [94]

Hey there!

The answer is A. That slavery was still allowed in a free nation.

One of the things the colonists fought for was freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press along with other things.

However, for hundreds of thousands of slaves torn away from their homes, they had none of these freedoms. They were considered inferior and not people.

A paradox is a statement that seems absurd of self-contradictory, which this statement very much is. If the U.S. is a free nation, then why do hundreds of thousands of people living there have no freedoms, stolen from them by the very people who advocated for their own freedom?

Hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

How did Louisiana attempt to attract immigrants to the state in the early 1900s? Officials visited other parts of the country to

IRISSAK [1]

Answer: In the late 1800s, people in many parts of the planet decided to go away from their homes and immigrate to U.S. Fleeing negligence, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived because of the land of economic opportunity.

7 0

3 years ago

-Confederate troops continuing fighting even after the war ended

rodikova [14]

The answer is C. Battle of Palmito Ranch because Robert E. Lee, the last land action of the civil was took place at Palmito Ranch near Brownsville.

6 0

3 years ago