The second one man. I believe that's the answere
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:
The correct answer is rule of law.
Explanation:
Plato and Aristotle had strong beliefs against the rule of law.
The rule of law is the legal concept that says that no one is exempt from the law, including monarchs or people in power. Plato and Aristotle also referred to tyranny, the form of government that exists when people allow one individual to ha all the power. In this scenario, the ruler uses its power for the benefit of its own interests. Both philosophers heavily favored democracy. The lived in Athens, the city-state where democracy was created.
A. It became a trading center due to its location and size.