Here is information for both sides
Martin Luther King Jr.
One might want to be part of Martin Luther King Junior's movement because he was an advocate of nonviolence. King felt that violence only caused more problems and would allow for white citizens to continue to perceive African-Americans as hostile and unworth of equal treatment in America. This is why King would go on to organize several peaceful protests including marches, sit-ins, and boycotts. All of these can be seen as effective as they helped to get rid of racist policies and laws within the United States.
Malcolm X
One might want to be part of Malcolm X's movement because he is an advocate for standing up for oneself. Malcolm X refuses to be physically harrassed or hurt by white citizens who are trying to take away his rights. This refusal to back down shows courage and can result in change in the way people view African-American citizens.
Answer:
Even still, the revolution marked the end of a dynasty that had lasted 300 years and concluded with the seizure of power by a small revolutionary group. The tsar was replaced with a Council of People's Commissars and private ownership was abolished.
It was historically significant because it was a victory for the workers. It was established by the supreme court that labor unions are not and can't be forbidden and that workers can unionize to protect themselves. This was important worldwide also because now workers from other countries saw that it was possible to win something like this.
Martin Luther was raised in the church with a solid education in the church's teachings and in the art of scholarly debate. He spent time living as a monk, knowing the Catholic Church's spiritual path from that perspective. As a monk, he had traveled to Rome and seen the corruption that was evident there, which shocked him. He had studied deeply to become a Doctor of Theology and taught theology at the University of Wittenberg. He had the training and stature to contend with the powerful leaders within the Catholic Church, because his own scholarship and skill were second to none. And he personally had experienced the overwhelming sense of guilt that the scholastic theology of the church had imposed on him, in contrast to the message of grace in Christ that he found when studying the Bible itself.
