Answer:
A conversation between two business men for example, would include: Hand movement when talking but not too much, eye contact, good posture, small smile which makes you approachable.
This would not include: Slouching, eyes drifting away, don't look clearly bored, don't ignore their potential questions.
Include a proper greeting and farewell. In this situation you are talking to a business man so use professional language and talk/act in a mature manner.
Hope I could help <33
Explanation:
Explanation:
Helen Frangedis is a high school teacher that always includes The Catcher in the Rye in her course syllabus for the year. Parents are always concerned about the book because of the profanity, drug and alcohol references, and “loose moral codes”. When presented with these concerns, Frangedis states that there is a deeper meaning in the book and the students have the challenge of finding it. She addresses her audience of parents with good reasons of reading and analyzing the book, while understanding their concerns.
Frangedis’s article focuses entirely on J. D. Salenger’s writing style. Salenger greatly exaggerates Holden, his issues, and society throughout the book and that leads to all of the profanity and drug/alcohol references. With his writing style, people began to notice, read, and criticize “The Catcher in the Rye,” all because of one reason; Salenger’s exaggerating writing style. Society always pays attention to the bigger, more exaggerated, stunning news. For example, people will pay more attention to the semi-truck that flipped over than the car that hit a pole. The reason is simple. Watching the truck flip over is more stunning and impressive than a car hit something. The same goes for “The Catcher in the Rye”. People will read a book that is full of drugs, cursing, and drinking over the book that is nice, short, and sweet. Knowing who society is and how it works, Salenger wrote a book that not only goes against society, but separates him from all other authors.
Because if you never grow up you'll never be treated like a grown up
Answer:
This is what I wrote:
Jack London believed that people more in touch with the wild are stronger than the civilized.
My "Jack London" paragraph:
Human beings who are more in touch with the wild are stronger, this is for the reason being of their ability to adapt and change from their knowledge, while a domesticated being is not as self-reliant. Those of the untamed wilderness would have to build their own shelters and live off the land which interprets their wild side, whereas the tame and cultivated rely on others and the rest of the society. Intelligence strives off of the wild from the power those humans have to learn and teach instead of just simply living.
Explanation:
This could be about tribes who live primitively or frontiersmen or pioneers, or homesteaders. People who had to build their own shelter, build their own homes, live off the lands, etc.
This is the best I could do and I think I am the only one who has answered this ;-;
I really hope it helps!
