Answer:
The British forces began their return march to Boston after completing their search for military supplies, and more militiamen continued to arrive from the neighboring towns. Gunfire erupted again between the two sides and continued throughout the day as the regulars marched back towards Boston.
Explanation:
The art of rhetoric helps reveal a moral distinction between leadership and Authocratic governing
<h3>What is the art of rhetoric?</h3>
Rhetoric deals with persuading an individual or group of people in a logical way.
This can be done with a speech that is persuasive and it can also be done with some element of history.
A leader uses a persuasive speech and not an authocratic Individual.
An authocratic individual is authoritative in nature with no persuasive approach when addressing people.
He speaks and what and people to do as he bids them.
Therefore,
The art of rhetoric helps reveal a moral distinction between leadership and Authocratic governing
Learn more on leader below
brainly.com/question/1232764
#SPJ1
Answer:
It says that people have the right to keep and carry guns. The second amendment is the right to bear arms.
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
