Answer:
is this a fact or an question?
Explanation:
Answer:
5 people
Explanation:
4 survivors and the shooter
___ courts determine the facts of the case (Did John Smith try to blow up a federal building?), build a record detailing the evidence, and then apply the law to reach a ruling.
Circuit
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
I'm going to say judicial review. However since your question is a little unclear, I'm not sure this is the answer you want.
