I'm pretty sure the courts your asking about are these: <u>Court of
</u>
<u>Appeals for the Armed Forces,</u>
<u> U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit</u>
<u> and the Tax Court </u>
The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
Answer:
The answer is compensating wage differentials.
Explanation:
The term refers to an extra amount of money that should be offered to a worker in order to perform a difficult, dangerous or undisirable job. On the other hand, it's also possible to offer a <u>negative</u> differential for jobs that may be desirable or easy to perform (they get paid less).
Some factors to consider are risk of injury or risk of future unemployment.
<span>No, because getting a degree doesn't necessarily mean that the student wont learn new things, a degree is, of course, an recognition of completion of academic objectives, but more importantly, is thinking about what is about to be taught. the content should be understandable for anybody, making sure we are teaching for all kinds of learners. making sure the students get this new idea we have to show them.</span>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it's a stronger education
