Answer:
<em><u>The answer is</u></em>: <u>Today there are not, or there are very few ethical implications of online social networks after someone's death.</u>
Explanation:
<u>Social networks every day provide the highest degree of presence, they also involve large risk tests regarding privacy</u>.
<u>Given these concerns, a minimum requirement would be for companies a guarantee that</u>:
1.- Consumers are informed about how their data can be displayed after mortem.
2.- users are not represented radically different from the bot in which they originally entered.
And 3.- users only upload data that belongs to them personally, that is, do not make bots of a deceased relative or friend.
<u>Requirements such as these could be imposed by regulators</u>, but may equally well be established by internal agreements within the industry, such as the COM Code of Ethics, or even be incorporated into the ethical, work of politicians, of individual companies.
Today, however, there are no or very few explicit requirements like these.
<u>These concerns require care, research, and dialogue</u> between policy makers, industry and expert scholars.
<u>They will only grow in importance as the dead become increasingly numerous online, in developing a constructive ethical approach:</u> The first step is to decide to what extent, and under what circumstances, the memory of the deceased must be conducted and shaped by the commercial Industry interest
The second, and equally important, the step will be to develop a regulatory framework, commonly adapted to ensure the dignity of those who are named and remembered online.
<em><u>The answer is</u></em>: <u>Today there are not, or there are very few ethical implications of online social networks after someone's death.</u>