There are all sorts of ways to reconstruct the history of life on Earth. Pinning down when specific events occurred is often tricky, though. For this, biologists depend mainly on dating the rocks in which fossils are found, and by looking at the “molecular clocks” in the DNA of living organisms.
There are problems with each of these methods. The fossil record is like a movie with most of the frames cut out. Because it is so incomplete, it can be difficult to establish exactly when particular evolutionary changes happened.
Modern genetics allows scientists to measure how different species are from each other at a molecular level, and thus to estimate how much time has passed since a single lineage split into different species. Confounding factors rack up for species that are very distantly related, making the earlier dates more uncertain.
These difficulties mean that the dates in the timeline should be taken as approximate. As a general rule, they become more uncertain the further back along the geological timescale we look. Dates that are very uncertain are marked with a question mark.
Answer:
from the lens
Explanation:
it easy gasbbsbsbbsbsbsbbsbsbssbsbssbsbsbbbssbsnns
A firework display because it’s not moving it’s a display
Answer:
One controversy that has resulted from the Human Genome Project is the ethics of genetic engineering and whether it should be used to create so-called "designer babies." Proponents of genetic engineering argue that it has the potential to eliminate genetic disorders and diseases, and that it could improve the overall health and well-being of future generations. For example, parents could use genetic engineering to ensure that their children have a lower risk of developing conditions like diabetes or heart disease.
On the other hand, opponents of genetic engineering argue that it could lead to a number of social and ethical problems. For instance, some people worry that genetic engineering could be used to create a society of genetically superior individuals, leading to inequality and discrimination. Additionally, opponents argue that we do not yet fully understand the potential risks and long-term effects of genetic engineering, and that we should therefore proceed with caution. They also raise concerns about the potential misuse of genetic engineering, such as using it to create individuals with enhanced physical or intellectual abilities for military or other nefarious purposes.
In conclusion, while genetic engineering has the potential to bring many benefits, there are also valid concerns about its potential consequences. It is important for society to carefully consider these issues and to proceed with caution.
Explanation:
