Answer:
1. C. 12 cases remaining
2. B. 3 days
3. A. 4 Cases
4. A. $2.00
5. B. 11 cases
Explanation:
4 cases of beer are sold everyday. The ordering cost is $8.00 per order,
Reorder point = Lead time * Units demanded per day
Reorder point = 3 days * 4 cases of beer = 12 cases remaining
Economic Order Quantity = 
EOQ = 11 cases
Answer:
$156 million
Explanation:
The computation of the change in net working capital is shown below:
Free cash flow = EBIT × (1 -Tax Rate) + Depreciation & Amortization - Change in Net Working Capital - net capital Expenditure.
$180 million = $960 million × (1 - 40%) + $120 million - change in working capital - $360 million
$180 million = $576 million + $120 million - change in working capital - $360 million
$180 million = $336 million - change in working capital
So, the change in working capital would be
= $336 million - $180 million
= $156 million
Considering the situation described above, this is an example of the "Reward-based" model of crowdfunding.
This is because a reward-based crowdfunding model is a type of crowdfunding that gives the donor something of value in return.
These rewards may be in the form of commodities, services, discounts, or adverts, etc.
There are various types of crowdfunding models. The most common types are the following:
- Equity-based model;
- Donation or social-based model;
- Lending model;
- Reward-based model.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the "Reward-based model" of crowdfunding.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/21940014
Answer:
Reinvestment risk
Explanation:
The mortgage banker would be most concerned about reinvestment risk, among other risks. Reinvestment risk relates to the inability to earn an original interest rate on an investment from periodic cash flows from the investment, thus limiting the overall rate of return on the investment.
In the question, since market mortgage rate has declined to 7.5%, the mortgage bank would have to reinvest the amount repaid from the original borrower at the new market rate, which is 1% lower than the ruling rate when the original borrower took the loan.
The problem would be compounded if the cost of funding to the mortgage bank was, for instance 8%. If that was the case, on the original loan, the mortgage bank was earning a (8.5% less 8% cost of funding =) 0.5% on the loan. However, due to the decline in market rates, the mortgage bank would have a cost of 8% compare to a market rate of 7.5% it would earn, thus resulting in a negative return of 0.5%.