Hi, the correct answer is true. Hope I helped.
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
Answer:
cost reduction and standardizing its products globally.
Explanation:
- Lenovo needs to capitalize on the consumer trends and the universal needs of the products globally and seek to reduce the costs in increasing flexibility, acquire knowledge, scale economies, and improve on the quality of the product and the process that creates them.
TWO recent CSI/CSR initiatives that the chosen Public Company carries-
CSR describes the wider technique to triple-bottom-line subjects of the 3Ps – earnings, people and planet. CSI is one of the sub-additives of CSR and targets to uplift groups in such a manner that the satisfactory of lifestyles is normally stepped forward and safeguarded.
Some examples of CSR in action include:
- Reducing carbon footprint.
- Engaging in charity work.
- Purchasing fair trade products.
- Investing in environmentally conscious businesses.
- Getting involved in volunteer work.
- Improving labor policies.
CSI includes initiatives that are not directly related to boosting a company's bottom line and are carried out outside of its regular business operations. These programs are not primarily driven by marketing goals but instead have a strong developmental perspective and make use of business resources to help and improve communities.
Learn more about NPOs brainly.com/question/950962
#SPJ9
