Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
Many people argue on the fall of Rome.
Some people thought it was destroyed by other countries mainly Greece.
Others believe it was too powerful and could not control so it fell by losing power.
The fall of Rome is still unknown.
The answer is true. the reason is because the us traded with Britain, Britain to Africa, and Africa to the us.
B. are more advanced in their theory of the mind
Children who are bilingual by the age of 5 have a more advanced mind due to the fact that they could take in and learn that material at such a young age.
