How did the political and religious ideas of the Byzantine Empire compare with the Western Empire?

1 answer:

6 0

Because The Byzantine emperor was considered to be the highest political and religious figure. In the Western Empire, the highest political and religious figures were two different people.
In Byzantine empire, the church officials were integrated with the government officials, making all the policies that made by the government is strongly tied to the rules of the bible. The western empire, on the other hand, tend to not include the church officials in the government (but they still treat their opinion with respect)

You might be interested in

Read the quote from NATO’s first Secretary General. [Our goal] is to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans do

Anastasy [175]

keep the Russians from taking over Europe. just too the test and passed

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

BRAINLIEST 50 points! How did the Great Schism weaken the Byzantine Empire?

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

the Great Schism split the main faction of Christianity into two divisions, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox.

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following best describes the Washington economy since World War II?

ahrayia [7]

The answer here my dude is c

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the Five Pillars of Islam?

hoa [83]

Answer:

practices that Muslims must follow

Explanation:

The five pillars – the declaration of faith (shahada), prayer (salah), alms-giving (zakat), fasting (sawm) and pilgrimage (hajj) – constitute the basic norms of Islamic practice. They are accepted by Muslims globally irrespective of ethnic, regional or sectarian differences.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which identifies the effects of the Congress of Vienna?

BartSMP [9]

Correct answer: C. The congress system if set up became a model for the United Nations.

Explanation:

My authority source for choosing answer C is the United Nations itself. UN Chronicle, the magazine of the United Nations, featured an article titled, "From the Congress of Vienna to Present-Day International Organizations" (December, 2014). That article asserts points such as these:

When did the process of international organization start?1 It was not in 1945 nor in 1919. Rather, it was the Congress of Vienna (1814-15) that proved to be the relevant turning point in history, when certain conditions allowed a number of European States to set in motion a series of innovations, inventions and learning processes that shaped the core of what we today refer to as international organizations (IOs).
The major innovation at Vienna was the follow-up conference. This new idea resulted in the custom of participating States to convene, upon reaching an agreement, a follow-up conference to assess whether previously agreed-upon decisions and policies had been executed. ... Consequently, since 1815, that innovative idea resulted in an ongoing cycle of conferences dealing with similar and related issues. Apart from continuity, the cycle produced incremental decision-making and path dependency with regard to selected common solutions and efforts.

5 0

3 years ago