Error code:531346136792 please contact server host administrator
Answer:
the sons of liberty
Explanation:
A loyalist belived that the british were right and would do anything to keep them happy. On the other hand , the sons of liberty hated the british and were responsible for the boston tea party, and would most likely attack the loyalist if they knew. i hope this helps :)
President Theodore Roosevelt compared the role of a president to that of the role of a "Steward," since it is this persons role to look after the passengers on a ship.
He refers to his subordinate statement, he did not take the decisions, he only obeyed them. The moral implications of the policies of President Van Buren (and his predecessor Andrew Jackson) did not make those orders easy. But as a subordinate and not popularly elected, I had to obey them. Finding the best conditions for the Cherokee people was all he could do. In his instructions to the militia, he reminded them that any act of cruelty would become "an aberration to the generous sympathies of the American people" (many of whom, like John Quincy Adams, were against the transfer, blaming Southern politicians and the land usurpers ").
