It really depends on the issues you are talking about. When it comes to basic human rights like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness I would say yes. However, I don’t hunk they were talking about equality in the lgbt+ community, aborti*n, or gun control. Hope this helped
Answer:a. high uncertainty avoidance
Explanation:Cultures which hold high uncertainty avoidance do not tolerate ambiguity and vagueness when it comes to daily lives. They don't like to take risks and would rather stick to rules and well established structures rather than taking a path that may lead them to unstructured situations.
Between the years 1778 and 1783, the nations of France and England disputed a war between each other. Both nations were the greatest powers on Earth during that time, and the conflict was a result of both parties trying to beat the other in relation to the amount of colonies they had, specially in America.
It can be said that the biggest winner of this conflict was neither France or England, but the United States of America. The north-american country benefited from the conflict for many years, simply by serving both sides.
The way in which new scientific instruments improved the accuracy of observation is they made objects more precise.
<h3>What is a Scientific Instrument?</h3>
This refers to the use of tools for the purposes of scientific research and analysis to get answers about a particular phenomenon.
Hence, we can see that instruments like the microscope and telescope, brought things that were far away or too small into focus so that they could be easily observed and studied.
Read more about microscopes here:
brainly.com/question/15744335
