Sometimes two-party systems have been seen as preferable to multi-party systems because they are simpler to govern, with less fractiousness and greater harmony, since it discourages radical minor parties
Answer:
Roanoke Colony (1585)
Jamestown Colony (1607)
Plymouth Colony (1620)
King Phillip's War (1675–1678)
King William's War (1688–1697)
Queen Anne's War (1702–1713)
King George's War (1744–1748)
Stamp Act (1765)
Lexington and Concord (1775)
Declaration of Independence (1776)
French Alliance (1777)
Articles of Confederation ratified (1781)
Yorktown (1781)
Treaty of Paris 1783
Shay's Rebellion (1786-1787)
US Constitution ratified (1788)
Explanation:
Mentioned events are important as they are showing us how colonies in North America were developing. From establishment of first colony until the American constitution this are all important events from that period.
It depends but I would say 1 to 3 percent
Colonists who supported the British cause in the American Revolution<span> were Loyalists, often called </span><span>Tories</span>
Jubal Early's army was a threat to the North because they made a raid and were about to take Washington D.C.
Jubal Anderson Early (1816 - 1894) was a military leader of the American Confederacy noted for being an opponent of secession. Nonetheless, he supported his home state Virginia once the War began.
When he joined the army he had the position of Colonel and participated in the battles of:
- First and second battle of Bull Run
- Battle of Antietam
- Battle of Fredericksburg
- Battle of Chancellorsville
- Battle of Gettysburg.
- Battle of the Wilds
- Battle of Spotsylvania
Early stood out for commanding the Confederate forces towards the Shenandoah Valley in 1864. In this dispute they were a great threat to the Union because they were about to take Washington DC, but were defeated by Union troops commanded by Philip Sheridan.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/15294054
