Answer:
a.the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi
Explanation:
In the event where TP who sold a franchise to Choi decides to go out of business and transfers everything to a third. In a lawsuit the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi.
The place in the quadrant where there is the focus is on leveraging current core competencies to improve current market position is known as:
- existing competence--existing market
<h3>What is a Market?</h3>
This is a place where buying and selling of goods or services takes place and a currency of value is exchanged.
With this in mind, we can see that in the existing competence--existing market, there is a focus is on leveraging current core competencies to improve current market position.
Read more about markets here:
brainly.com/question/26098648
Answer:
competition
Explanation:
In simple words, competition refers to the tendency of two or more parties to perform better than one another for the sake of own personal benefits. In business, competition can be done from various perspectives like price or quality.
In the given case, Jeff has been producing at a lower cost but despite of earning high profits he is willing to sell for lower prices with the motive of competing in the market and gaining higher market share.
Answer:
3.53 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below:
In year 0 = $8,300
In year 1 = $2,100
In year 2 = $3,000
In year 3 = $2,300
In year 4 = $1,700
If we sum the first 3 year cash inflows than it would be $7,400
Now we subtract the $7,400 from the $8,300 , so the amount is $900 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it
And, the next year cash inflow is $1,700
So, the payback period equal to
= 3 years + $900 ÷ $1,700
= 3.53 years
