Answer:
a. 45%
Explanation:
The sum of total probabilities is always equal to 1. Since in the given question only three probabilities are given, so the sum of these three probabilities shall be 1 which is represented as follows by the equation:
probability of boom+probability of normal+probability of recession=1
In the given question:
probability of boom=30%
probability of recession=25%
30%+probability of normal+25%=1
Probability of normal=1-25%-30%=45%
So based on the above calculations, the answer shall be a. 45%
Answer:
Loss
Explanation:
Because she started with 860.00 then ended with 300
Arts Direction
that is the answer
hope it works
Answer:
Macmillana's GDP is less sensitive economic fluctuations than Bloedelo's GDP. Two reasons account for this:
1) The keynesian multiplier is smaller.
The keynesian multiplier tells us about the sensitivity of GDP to increases in domestic expenditure (consumption, investment or government purchases). If the keynesian multiplier is small, then, GDP will be less sensitive to fluctuations in aggregate expenditure.
2) Macmillana's economy has implemented automatic stabilizers, while Bloedelo's economy has not.
Automatic Stabilizers are government policies meant to reduce fluctuations in GDP. The two most common automatic stabilizers are: income taxes and unemployment benefits.
Automatic Stabilizers reduce the kenyensian multiplier, dampening Macmillana's GDP sensitivity to fluctuations even more.
Answer:
$0.4433 and $0.425
Explanation:
The computation of the earning per share is shown below:
Earning per share is
= (Net income - preference dividend) ÷ (average shares outstanding)
For 2017, it is
= ($156 - $23) ÷ (300 shares)
= $0.4433
For 2018, it is
= ($188 - $18) ÷ (400 shares)
= $0.425
We simply applied the above formula so that the earning per share could be come for both the years
