1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Allushta [10]
3 years ago
14

The question raised by McCulloch v. Maryland was whether ..

History
2 answers:
Reika [66]3 years ago
8 0

The US Supreme Court ruling on the case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is one of the most important decisions in the history of US jurisprudence. The president of the Supreme Court at the time was John Marshall, former Secretary of State of US President John Adams.

The state of Maryland had tried to impede the running of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States (a bank founded to face the difficulties encountered by the administration of the 4th President of the United States of America, James Madison). Maryland demanded its unconstitutionality, as an expression of a government act not provided for by the constitution. He had previously imposed a prohibitive tax for the time on all banknotes not issued within the confines of the state.

James McCulloch, who held the highest authority for the Baltimore branch of the US Second Bank, refused to pay the tax. A lawsuit was initiated between the state and McCulloch, who was first presented before John James, and then before the Maryland Court of Appeals and then went to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, after showing off the theory of Alexander Hamilton on the implicit powers that the Constitution gave to the Congress, affirmed the legitimacy of the federal government, its complete independence and its prevalence over the individual states. He then ruled that even if the Constitution did not officially foresee it, it fell within the powers entrusted by the government and all states could not impede its function.


Alina [70]3 years ago
3 0
The answer to this question is:

The question raised by McCulloch v. Maryland was whether ..?<span>"A state license was more important than a federal one"

</span>Hoped This Helped,  Maxine200034 
Your Welcome :)
You might be interested in
What effect might the time period have had on the kind of government the Articles of Confederation set up?
Serga [27]

Answer:

How the Articles of Confederation were set up caused the central government to haveslight authority that could not really be enforced. The states had agreed to "worktogether" but were not truly unified. The Articles had given too much power to the statestherefore setting up a truly weak, centralized government. Shay's rebellion highlightedweaknesses within the papers themselves. For example, the central government had nofunds, as they had no authority to tax the people. This meant that there was no fundedmilitary to help stop the rebellion. It was up to the state of Massachusetts to fund theirown militia to put a stop to Shay's Rebellion. At the same time, this meant that the statestruly could get away with almost anything they wanted to do. If the central government did not have the resources to go after them, why would the States feel obligated to adhere to national policies? The clear flaws of the Articles brought a divide between the people

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Coal, steel, and steam engine production greatly increased due to which of the following?
Stells [14]

C. revolutions

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, THANK YOU, AND 5-STAR RATING!!!
Sophie [7]

Answer:

These ideas contributed to the Enlightenment idea of progress- the idea that humans were capable of improving their world. ... Enlightenment thinkers believed that natural laws also governed human society and government. New Ideas. French philosophers popularized many Enlightenment ideas.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which action led most directly to divisions in
Sloan [31]
Martin Luther posting the Ninety-five Theses
6 0
3 years ago
The bolsheviks were communist revolutionaries who successfully overtook the Russian empire
alexgriva [62]
True

The Bolshevik was a communist regime that was able to defeat the white armies, or the Melsheviks(?) (Sorry can't spell it), who only were able to fight together because they didn't want communism.

The white army was co.mprised of people who still wanted the noble family, those who wanted democracy, and people who just don't like communism, while the boshelviks were communists who wished to place the whole country under their ideology


Hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • • What landmarks best reveal the synthesis of Germanic, Greco-Roman, and Christian cultures in the era known as the early Middle
    15·1 answer
  • Jamal baked muffins for the school bake sale. He made 12 corn muffins and 15 blueberry
    10·1 answer
  • They want to purify or reform the church of england? who was it
    5·2 answers
  • Witch of the following was included in Patrick Henry’s Virginia resolves
    15·1 answer
  • How do socialists generally differ from communist
    9·1 answer
  • During the campaign of 1828 the Democratic Party changed by
    12·1 answer
  • How did geography impact the political fortunes and development of the state of texas
    7·1 answer
  • Why has globalization become such an important part of the world?
    10·1 answer
  • Which choices indicate the religious groups that settled in the New England Colonies?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE? a. When William Travis gave the men at the Alamo a chance to leave, over 180 men sta
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!