Answer: A. Marta is conscious, and Michael and George are unconscious.
Explanation:
If they are trying to prevent aspiration, the patient is likely to be unconscious and needs to be turned on its side. This prevents the patient from choking because if they’re unconscious, they can’t swallow the saliva.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which action demonstrates application of the least restrictive alternative doctrine, would be: With the person´s agreement, arrange with him therapy and counseling through outpatient services.
Explanation:
In treating people who are presenting some form of psychological, or emotional, imbalace, it depends on the level of compromise of that person´s welfare and wellbeing that certain restrictive alternatives, such as hospitalization, will be taken. In the case of this patient, he does not present with a level of emotional, or psychological compromise that would make such a high level of restrictive measure, as hospitalization, necessary. Instead, the least restrictive alternative doctrine dictates that this patient will need the least restrictive choice of treatment available, so that he still receives attention for his moderate depression. The best option for this patient is, therefore, outpatient counseling and therapy.
Answer:
The cerebrum, the large, outer part of the brain, controls reading, thinking, learning, speech, emotions and planned muscle movements like walking
Explanation:
They are transmitted through having sex
