I need one more brainliest to level up I feel it TwT
Answer:
1. I feel like Pat's new strategy isn't ethical. Pat doesn't pay for the suits; he just buys them and then returns them. Pat benefits, but the store he gets the suits from doesn't. In fact, they are harmed from this transaction because they are unable to have the suit for others to buy while Pat has it. There could be consequences with this strategy. For example, the suit might be damaged, and Pat won't be able to return it. Another problem is that others might find out about Pat's strategy, and they might view them as unprofessional. This is a problem for Pat since the reason Pat wore those suits was to look professional.
2. The stores are harmed from this transaction. They are unable to sell the suits to other buyers. The stores lose potential customers, so the stores lose potential money.
3. The companies should record that Pat had bought the suit only to return it the next day, so that they can act accordingly when Pat or someone else comes back to "buy" a suit.
Explanation:
Answer:
The best recommendation to be made to this client is to do nothing.
Explanation:
Investment in stock is a highly risky investment because price of stock often fluctuates which can make an investor to lose a lot of money.
From the question, the client is already old at age 67 with a low income and he does not have any other liquid assets apart from the annual income of $25,000, mainly from social security and interest on funds held in a bank savings account.
Since losing so much money through investment in stock is not affordable to him, the best recommendation to be made to this client is to that he should do nothing.
Answer:
C) there was an offer, acceptance, and consideration
Explanation:
The doctrine of promissory estoppel requires that the following 5 elements must exist:
- The parties must anticipate that some type of legal relationship will exist between them.
- One party must have made a promise to another party.
- One party must rely on the promise made by the other party.
- The party that relied on the promise made by the other party must suffer a detriment if the promise is not fulfilled.
- Unconscionability
, in other words, there is nothing that forbids the party from performing the promise.
The question is incomplete. However, it is about the calculation of after-tax cost of payment
Answer:
After-tax cost = payment*(1-0.37)
Explanation:
The after-tax cost is the net cost after the deduction of the amount of tax from the actual payment. In most cases, the value of the tax deduction is determined by multiplying the marginal tax rate with the payment. Then, the magnitude of the after-tax cost can be estimated by subtracting the payment from the tax deduction.
